I dunno - a series of cable stay's across the waterfront - it seems to do the same thing that the viaduct does while being even more obtrusive. I like the tunnel idea because it opens up all that land to (hopefully) residential uses. And of course I like our idea to rebuild the viaduct but higher up so the city can flow underneath it. That won't happen though.
I also like the "do nothing" approach. It will add some congestion and get people thinking more about mass transit. Ao.
The bridge seems weird and something that Seattleites wouldn't go for. I'm down with a viaduct rebuild... I honestly do like the way the city looks with the highway running along its front.
2 Comments:
I dunno - a series of cable stay's across the waterfront - it seems to do the same thing that the viaduct does while being even more obtrusive. I like the tunnel idea because it opens up all that land to (hopefully) residential uses. And of course I like our idea to rebuild the viaduct but higher up so the city can flow underneath it. That won't happen though.
I also like the "do nothing" approach. It will add some congestion and get people thinking more about mass transit. Ao.
The bridge seems weird and something that Seattleites wouldn't go for. I'm down with a viaduct rebuild... I honestly do like the way the city looks with the highway running along its front.
Post a Comment
<< Home